![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
SPIE Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabrication, Volume 1: MicrolithographySection 2.5 Systems: 2.5.7 SCALPEL
2.5.1 Environment
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Instead of using an absorbing mask, Koops and Grob [85] proposed and researchers at AT&T Bell Laboratories [86-88] (now known as Lucent Techologies) later implemented the idea of using a scattering mask to produce a high contrast image with a technique commonly used in transmission electron microscopy. Figure 2.26 illustrates the technique "scattering with angular limitation in projection electron beam lithography," or SCALPEL. Electrons traveling through a thin (typically 150 nm) silicon nitride membrane are focused by a lens and pass through an aperture (the "back focal plane filter"). Electrons scattered by the adsorber (typically 50 nm of Au or W) are most likely not to pass through the aperture. By choosing an optimal accelerating voltage (95 kV) for the membrane thickness (100 nm of low-stress silicon nitride) and adsorber (50 nm W), the contrast at the substrate can be as high as 95%, with a transmission of 55%. [89]
If the focal plane aperture includes an annular ring, then some of the "dark field" electrons pass through to expose the resist. The unfocused dark field image of the mask can thereby be used to provide a background dose correction to compensate for proximity effect, using a technique similar to GHOST [40] (see Sec. 2.4.3.3). Although this compensation scheme is still in the design stage, it holds the promise of proximity effect correction without any loss of throughput. [90]
As in cell projection, the mask is sequentially scanned and the image shifted and reduced onto the wafer. However, because the scattering features can be much thinner than the holes of cell projection, patterns can be fabricated at smaller dimensions and the demagnification of the mask can be decreased to 5. A much larger chip can then be fabricated, with up to 21010 pixels. [91] Massive support struts between the "cells" are not imaged onto the wafer since the patterns are shifted into place as they are illuminated. While the mask structure is similar to those used for x-ray lithography, the support struts provide greater dimensional stability, [84] and use of reduction optics makes mask fabrication simpler.
The throughput of a fully-developed SCALPEL tools (which to date has only been modeled) is expected to be comparable to that of an optical stepper, while delivering resolution on the scale of 0.1 um. However, several questions remain concerning its practical use: At energies in the 100 kV range resists are proportionally less sensitive, and the energy delivered to the substrate will be larger than in conventional e-beam systems. The effect this may have on transistor thresholds and mobility is still unknown.
Next Sub-Section: 2.5.8 Other E-Beam System Research
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
![]() ![]()
|
||
|
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0649215. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Cornell NanoScale Science & Technology Facility (CNF) 250 Duffield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-2700 Voice: 607-255-2329, Fax: 607-255-8601, Email: information@cnf.cornell.edu Powered by ITX |
||