![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
SPIE Handbook of Microlithography, Micromachining and Microfabrication, Volume 1: MicrolithographySection 2.5 Systems: 2.5.6 Shaped Spot and Cell Projection Systems
2.5.1 Environment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| FIGURE 2.25 Schematic of the IBM EL-4 column for shaped-beam lithography. On the right, the dashed ray trace corresponds to the source, and the solid trace to the shaped spot. [66] (Courtesy of IBM Corp.) |
JEOL's JBX-8600DV [71] provides 0.1 m resolution at 30 A/cm2 for direct-write applications. The system uses two stage electrostatic deflection, and handles 6 in. wafers. The JBX-7000MVII [72] has been developed as a 4 reticle making system for 256 Mbyte DRAM class devices. As with most shaped spot systems, the JEOL machines can create a map of distortion values for the deflection so that patterns can be mapped more precisely onto optically-generated features. The JBX 7000MVII handles up to 7 in. plates with a laser stage measurement unit of 0.6 nm (/1024). Overlay accuracy is 30 nm (3) and placement accuracy is 40 nm.
The attention to absolute pattern placement accuracy is always much more extensive in dedicated maskmaking tools than in direct-write machines. To control thermal expansion of the plates, temperature monitoring and stabilization is far more elaborate. Like other manufacturers, JEOL creates a map of stage nonlinearity by measuring a set of marks, turning the plate in 90 increments and measuring the set again. The resulting stage distortion map is used to reduce the runout due to imperfections in the stage mirror. In fact, each individual plate holder has its own specific distortion table, which is identified automatically by reading a bar code on the cassette.
The throughput of shaped beam tools is primarily limited by the average beam current in the spot, and by the pattern density. The average beam current for cell projection is modestly larger than for variable shaped beams. Both are limited by Coulomb interaction to a few microamperes. However, by replacing the simple beam shaping aperture with a more complex pattern, a "cell projection" system can greatly increase the pattern density without sacrificing throughput.
In cell projection systems the upper deflector steers the beam into one of a number of hole patterns, or "cells." The shaped beam is deflected back to the center of the column and is demagnified by another lens, forming an image on the substrate. The shaping aperture is made of a silicon membrane, around 20 m thick, patterned with holes and coated with gold or platinum. To maintain small aberrations and high resolution, the cell is demagnified by a factor of 20 to 100, and the final cell size on the wafer is only 2 to 10 m. The wafer containing these patterns also contains a simple rectangular aperture for general purpose pattern generation in a standard shaped spot mode. While a number of cell patterns may be placed on the beam shaping wafer, it is clear that the cell projection technique is advantageous and economical only for highly repetitive designs with small unit cells, namely, memory chips. Patterns for cell projection will require proximity correction by shape modification [38-39] or through a variation of the GHOST technique [40] (see Sect. 2.4.3).
To achieve throughput comparable to that of optical steppers, cell projection tools must reduce the shot count by a factor of around 100. Current machines have achieved shot reductions on the order of a factor of 10 and have throughputs of less than 10 wafer levels/hour (for a 6 in. wafer populated with 256 Mbyte DRAMs, ~109 shots/chip).
IBM, [73] Hitachi, [74-75] Toshiba, [76] Fujitsu, [77-78] and Leica have developed cell projection tools targeted for 256 Mbyte DRAM manufacture. Leica's "WePrint 200" instrument is a modified version of the ZBA-32. Hitachi also offers a cell projection/shaped spot system for sale: the HL-800D. Common features of cell projection systems include continuous stage motion [79] and resolution around 0.2 um. Hitachi's HL-800D reduces the cell reticle by a factor of 25, while Fujitsu uses a factor of 100 and Toshiba uses a factor of 40. The final demagnified cell size is kept below ~10 m to reduce aberrations. [76] Space charge effects also reduce the feature edge sharpness, but these can be compensated by using a current-dependent dynamic refocusing of the image. [75] [80-82] Cell projection has not yet achieved the throughput of optical steppers but as a transitional technology may provide the resolution needed for near-term 256 Mbyte DRAM production.
Table 2.4 Comparison of shaped spot systems.
| IBM Corp. | Etec Systems Inc. | JEOL Inc. | Leica Lithographie Systeme GmbH | Hitachi Inc. | |
| Model | EL-4 | Excaliber - under development | JBX-7000MVII | ZBA 31/32 WePrint-200 | HL-800D Cell Projection |
| Resolution | 0.15 um features, 50 nm CD control | 0.12 um | 0.2 to 0.5 um | 0.2, 30 nm CD control | 0.25 um, 50 nm CD control |
| Alignment | automated | automated | automated | automated | automated |
| Field | 10 mm maximum | 1 mm | 1.5 mm | 1.3 mm | |
| Energy | 75 kV | 100 kV | 20 kV | 20 kV | 50 kV |
| Speed | ~2-3 wafers/hour | 100 kV | 20 kV | 20 kV | 50 kV |
| Samples | 8 inch | 8 inch | up to 7 inch plate | 8 inch | 8 inch |
| Stage | "wayless" stage: electrostatic clamping, sliding chuck, servo powered, laser control with yaw compensation | "wayless" stage: electrostatic clamping, sliding chuck, servo powered, laser control with yaw compensation | laser controlled conventional stage | laser controlled conventional stage, cassette-to-cassette automated loading | laser controlled conventional stage |
| Cost | not for sale | system under development | high, >$3M | high, >$3M | high, >$3M |
| Contact | n/a | USA: 510-783-9210 France: 33-42-58-68-94 Japan: 81-425-27-8381 | USA: 518-535-5900, Japan: 0425-42-2187 | USA: 518-535-5900 Japan: 81-425-43-1111 | USA: 415-244-7594, 415-244-7612 fax, or in Japan: 81-3-5294-2061 |
Next Sub-Section: 2.5.7 SCALPEL
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
![]() ![]()
|
||
|
|
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0649215. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Cornell NanoScale Science & Technology Facility (CNF) 250 Duffield Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-2700 Voice: 607-255-2329, Fax: 607-255-8601, Email: information@cnf.cornell.edu Powered by ITX |
||